Anti-Politics of Israel and Palestine (Negative Affect in the Age of Misinformation)

If the essence of “the political” is the binding together of a collective across social difference then what one would otherwise call politics today in the Age of Trump and Musk is distinctly anti-political. Anti-politics is fed by binary things. It starts with the friend/enemy distinction and other antipathies, aggression powered by hate and rage, fear and grief. Anti-politics is an affectively charged artifact formed out of supercharged and hypermediated energies that tear apart at the social fabric from the outside-in and from the inside-out. The prefix “anti” is placed before an object of political animosity –a state, a people, a structure– which turns it into an object of hate.

My immediate point of interest is the politics of Israel and Palestine, which has become more and more anti-pathetic and anti-political since the collapse of the Oslo Peace Process almost a quarter of a century ago and whipped up digitally. No longer pragmatic and against co-existence, the anti-politics of Israel and Palestine is marked by eliminationist one-siderism supported by maximalist points of view and an evil spirit of non-recognition. This quality is crystallized, magnified, and extended online. Anti-Arab, anti-Islamic, anti-Israel, anti-Jewish, anti-Palestine, anti-Zionist, and, yes, anti-Semitic antipathies sound off and sustain each other in the virtual and actual world.

We live in the world surrounded by demons (mazikin or damagers). The demons are everywhere in power –Trump, Musk, Bannon, Putin, Netanyahu, Smotrich, Ben-Gvir, Sinwar, Dief, Nasrallah, Khamenei and their ilk.

The anti-politics of Israel and Palestine belongs to a global warp-and-woof in the Dis/Information Age. In the U.S. and on the global stage, our political life is buffeted by forces that are anti-democratic, anti-government, anti-global, anti-liberal, anti-science, anti-truth, anti-woke. The common root is anti-social and anti-human. Enmeshed in matrices of raw power, religion, and technology, the antipathies that today dominate the political environment aggravate in intentional ways the social sickness they manifest. The hatred, rage, grief, and fear at the bottomless bottom of the anti-political contaminate everything with which they come into contact –in countries and in civil society and in the human heart.

Good reason might impel us not to be anti-anything. Don’t be anti-Zionist and don’t be anti-Palestine when the better part of wisdom is to recognize and sit with the rage as a real thing in the world; then step away from the demonic powers that feed off these antipathies, from the demons intent on causing damage and destruction to people. Avoiding hard binaries and political dead-ends is to seek out a soft human core. In political struggle and at heart-rending moments of violence and destruction, these are decisions: to be pro-Israel and pro-Palestine, and if not pro-Palestine then at least not anti-Palestine; to be pro-Palestine and pro-Israel, and if not pro-Israel then least not anti-Israel. To resist the inertia pulling people into an abyss is to intentionally center oneself in society around human fragility and dignity, political intersections of communal and inter-communal interests and norms, social and political morality, the virtue of kindness and serving the public good.

Understanding that power and conflict are, indeed, basic principles of political life, a real thing in the world, there is, nonetheless, a difference to be had between essential oppositional anti-structures and concerted critical opposition. They have different ends in view. The misidentification of the so-called friend/enemy distinction as the essential structure of the political as such belongs to the order of fascist mythology and other anti-social and anti-human manifestations of domination and modern catastrophic politics. In contrast, critical opposition is dynamic and dyadic, reparative, not paranoid or psychotic, not binary and static, not one-or-the-other but both-and. Critical opposition sustains humane society and the value of life, what Augustine called the City of God, hedged in by demons who rule the place of destruction.

Posted in uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

(Netanyahu) Demons (Hamas) (Trump)

The morality and politics of Israel and Palestine under Netanyahu and Hamas, and Trump.

To grasp the situation, one has to think 3 things at the same time.

–Hamas opened the pits of hell on October 7.

–Netanyahu and the Religious Right in Israel hurtle the country into a moral and political abyss of their own making.

–Transfer psychosis is fed and made manifest by the most powerful person on the planet.

The people are abandoned (hostages, Palestinians, citizens of Israel).

Posted in uncategorized | Leave a comment

(Dostoyevsky) Demons (Luke)

Now a large herd of swine was feeding there on the hillside; and they begged him to let them enter these. So he gave them leave. Then the demons came out of the man and entered the swine, and the herd rushed down the steep bank into the lake and were drowned. When the herdsmen saw what had happened, they fled, and told it in the city and in the country. Then people went out to see what had happened, and they came to Jesus, and found the man from whom the demons had gone, sitting at the feet of Jesus, clothed and in his right mind; and they were afraid. And those who had seen it told them how he who had been possessed with demons was healed.

Epigraph to Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Demons

Luke 8:32-36 (RSV)

Posted in uncategorized | Leave a comment

Demon (Dictionary Definition) מַזִּיק

מַזִּיק m. (נָזַק) one who does damage, destroys, wastes. Yoma 80ᵇ, sq. כי יאכל פרט למ׳ ‘if he eats’ (Lev. XXII, 14) which excludes him who wastes (by eating excessively).—In gen. (ה) מ׳ the offender that occasioned damage, opp. ניזק the injured claimant. B. Kam. I, 2; a. fr.—Pl. מַזִּיקִים, מַזִּיקִיו. Ib. III, 11, v. נָזַק.—Gen. R. s. 54 מַוִּיקֵי ביתו the annoyances of one’s house (flies &c.).—Esp. demons. Ber. 3ᵃ, sq. מפני המ׳ on account of the demons (dwelling in ruins). Num. R. s. 12, beg.; a. fr.

מַזִּיק, מַזִּיקָא ch. same , esp. demon. Targ. Cant. VIII, 3.—Kidd. 29ᵇ הוה ההוא מ׳ … דאביי there was a demon dwelling in Abbayi’s school house.—Pl. מַזִּיקַיָּא, מַזִּיקִין, מַזִּיקֵי. Targ. Job V, 7. Targ. Ps. LXXXIX, 33 (ed. Lag. מוז׳); a. e.—Ḥull. 105ᵇ משום דשכיחי מ׳ because demons frequent there; a. e.

–from the Jastrow Dictionary of the Talmud (online at Sefaria), described elsewhere as “the definitive choice for studying the Talmud, Midrashim and Targumim.”

Posted in uncategorized | Leave a comment

Demons (מַּזִּיקִין)

Abba Binyamin says: If the eye was given permission to see, no creature would be able to withstand the demons.

Abaye said: They are more numerous than we and they stand over us like mounds of earth surrounding a pit.

Rav Huna said: Each and every one of us has a thousand to his left and ten thousand to his right.

One who seeks to know should place fine ashes around his bed, and in the morning appear like chickens’ footprints. One who seeks to see them should take the afterbirth of a firstborn female black cat, born to a firstborn female black cat, burn it in the fire, grind it and place it in his eyes, and he will see them. Place in an iron tube sealed with an iron seal [gushpanka] lest the demons steal it from him, and seal the opening so he will not be harmed. Rav Beivai bar Abaye performed this, saw, and was harmed. The Sages prayed for mercy on his and he was healed.

–Babylonian Talmud Berachot 6a

Posted in uncategorized | Leave a comment

(Liberal Community) 2025 Jewish National Book Awards (Comfort)

What is the value of a Jewish book and Jewish books? The 2025 Nation­al Jew­ish Book Awards are a liberal balm in the midst of a miserable year+ of hostage crisis and war and two+ miserable years of Kahanist government in Israel and spikes of anti-Semitism in the Diaspora and the election of Donald Trump in the United States. History, art, social commentary, memoir, food, children’s literature. The winners are listed here. In the face of harsh worlds and bad political headwinds, they run counter to the for-now regnant and cruel illiberal currents across the globe. The Jewish Book Council is a unique institution of American Judaism. They draw attention to important books whose mention do not and will not appear in non-Jewish spaces. Jewish books reminds us of the modest power of place, namely autonomous Jewish culture and humanistic expressions of Jewish community in a world that does not especially care for Jews and Jewish things and liberal humanism.

Posted in uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Anti-Zionism and/not Anti-Semitism (4 Working Statements)

Anti-Zionism and/not Anti-Semitism (4 Working Statements)

4 working statements on anti-Semitism and the relation between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism and/or anti-Israelism: IHRA, Nexus, Jerusalem Declaration, Association for Jewish Studies

All 4 declarations are only working definitions and legally non-binding.

All 4 declarations insist that the alleged anti-Semitic character of an anti-Zionist/Israel statement is context dependent.  

The IHRA was the first of its kind and goes back several years in response to alleged anti-Semitic acts committed primarily in Europe during a flareup of violence between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. It provides examples of anti-Israel statements that are prima facie anti-Semitic. Critics complain (i think unfairly) that it applies too broad a brush and has been weaponized by the right against pro-Palestine expression. The Nexus and Jerusalem statements take care to include examples of anti-Zionist/Israel statements that are anti-Semitic and also examples of anti-Zionist/Israel statements that are not prima facie anti-Semitic. The Jerusalem Declaration is the one favored by most progressive activists and academics, but many of its signatories are blue-chip liberal and progressive Zionists. The working statement from the Association for Jewish Studies has not gotten the attention it deserves. It addresses the broader subject of anti-Semitism while addressing the politics of Israel and Palestine, academic freedom, and free speech on campus.

This section from the Jerusalem Declaration is liberal Zionist and identifies expressions of anti-Zionist animus as anti-Semitic –dependent on context

Israel and Palestine: examples that, on the face of it, are antisemitic

Applying the symbols, images and negative stereotypes of classical antisemitism (see guidelines 2 and 3) to the State of Israel.

Holding Jews collectively responsible for Israel’s conduct or treating Jews, simply because they are Jewish, as agents of Israel.

Requiring people, because they are Jewish, publicly to condemn Israel or Zionism (for example, at a political meeting).

Assuming that non-Israeli Jews, simply because they are Jews, are necessarily more loyal to Israel than to their own countries.

Denying the right of Jews in the State of Israel to exist and flourish, collectively and individually, as Jews, in accordance with the principle of equality.

Here is the IHRA (International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance) Working Definition of Anti-Semitism

See also: https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism

Here is The Nexus Document (Understanding Antisemitism at Its Nexus with Israel and Zionism)

Here is the Jerusalem Declaration on Antisemitism

Here is A Working Report from the AJS (Association for Jewish Studies) Task Force on Antisemitism and Academic Freedom

Posted in uncategorized | Leave a comment

Winter Syracuse On The Road

[i have a fast car]

Posted in uncategorized | Leave a comment

Post-Holocaust Vulcan Social Solidarity (Spock Hears the Death Scream of 400 Vulcans)

A most Jewish moment in the Original Star Trek series, this confrontation between Spock and McCoy took my breath away. Spock’s soliloquy (truly speaking his mind outloud) comes as if out of nowhere n the mirror of post-Holocaust Jewish collective consciousness, Jewish-Christian friction and racial difference. It appeared on “The Immunity Syndrome” S2 E18, Star Trek (Remastered) (1968). In the episode, as per Wikipedia, the encounter with an “energy-draining, space-dwelling organism” begins when the USS Enterprise receives “a garbled message from Starfleet mentioning the USS Intrepid, a Federation starship crewed entirely by Vulcans.” Something terrible has happened. In a spasm of pain, Spock felt or sensed something horrible.

[Sickbay]

(Spock is on a biobed, being scanned.)

SPOCK: I assure you, Doctor, I am quite all right. The pain was momentary. It passed quickly.

McCOY: All of my instruments seem to agree with you if I can trust these crazy Vulcan readings. Spock, how can you be so sure the lntrepid was destroyed?

(Spock gets off the bed)

SPOCK: I sensed it die.

McCOY: But I thought you had to be in physical contact with a subject before

SPOCK: Doctor, even I, a half-Vulcan, could hear the death scream of four hundred Vulcan minds crying out over the distance between us.

McCOY: Not even a Vulcan could feel a starship die.

SPOCK: Call it a deep understanding of the way things happen to Vulcans, but I know not a person, not even the computers on board the Intrepid, knew what was killing them or would have understood it had they known.

McCOY: But four hundred Vulcans?

SPOCK: I’ve noticed that about your people, Doctor. You find it easier to understand the death of one than the death of a million. You speak about the objective hardness of the Vulcan heart, yet how little room there seems to be in yours.

McCOY: Suffer the death of thy neighbour, eh, Spock? You wouldn’t wish that on us, would you?

SPOCK: It might have rendered your history a bit less bloody.

Posted in uncategorized | Leave a comment

religious zionists oppose hostage deal

More grist for the mill. Religion and politics are a toxic mix. Critics of Israel have a point when they cast a critical eye on Israeli society as a whole. But as a social sector, religious Zionists are the only ones in Israel who oppose a hostage deal, one that everyone knows will end the war against Hamas in Gaza. These are the ones from those communities screaming about a deal that will bring the hostages home. I will start with this link here and build up this post over time. But the big question. What happens to religious Zionist communities if the war ends with hostages home and the reconstruction of Gaza, and no settlements. What did all the soldiers from the community die for? And how do their friends and family come to terms with that?

Posted in uncategorized | 3 Comments