Myth and Modernity: The End Point of Zionism

Odin, Wotan's nordic parallel, 18th centuryChief Rabbinate sign forbidding entrance  to the Temple Mount

Great piece by Timer Persico on myth, Zionism, and the Temple Mount. The takeaway is this: “If, as I believe, Zionism is a true and authentic continuation of the Jewish tradition, it must posit a valid alternative to the narrow interpretation of the Temple as an altar around which a family dynasty of priests revolved.” But I’m a little unsure. Does Zionism have to present itself as an “authentic continuation of Jewish tradition”? Why not present and even embrace Zionism as the break that it is from Jewish tradition?

About zjb

Zachary Braiterman is Professor of Religion in the Department of Religion at Syracuse University. His specialization is modern Jewish thought and philosophical aesthetics.
This entry was posted in uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Myth and Modernity: The End Point of Zionism

  1. Michael says:

    There is a broad scale of opinions among Jews as to whether it is allowed to visit the Temple Mount and/or to pray there. So, none else than the RaMBaM himself has visited the Mount and has prayed there. And the Minister of Religious Affairs should avoid comments like those mentioned above. His job is to provide the religious authorities with tools to do their work, not to judge on matters of religious content (Jewish, Muslim or Christian).

Leave a Reply