Not So Chummy (Ancient Near East Gods in Temples)

041

Reading Michael Hundley’s Gods in Dwelling: Temples and Divine Presence in the Ancient Near East, this made the greatest impression. As I’m reading it, this relates directly to debates about “monotheism.” Squirreled away in the innermost and most private sanctum of a temple, none of the so-called pagan temple-gods of the ancient near east were particularly close to the earth. “Immanent” would not even be the right word with which to describe Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Hittite, or Syro-Palestinian religions and temple-worship. Placing the anthropomorphically imaged representation of the deity inside the inner sanctum heightens its distance from the people and aligns it with kingship (pp.238, 251). Divine well-being is paramount. Access is severely restricted. “Separateness” and “otherness” are the keywords and standard with which to assess the temple-space and the gods within (133).

About zjb

Zachary Braiterman is Professor of Religion in the Department of Religion at Syracuse University. His specialization is modern Jewish though and philosophical aesthetics. http://religion.syr.edu
This entry was posted in uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Not So Chummy (Ancient Near East Gods in Temples)

  1. Milx says:

    Do scholars of ancient religions really use the term Syro-Palestinian, and if so, is that meant to encompass Cannanites > Philistines, Phoenicians and Israelites, or what?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s