[Richard Serra, One Ton Prop (House of Cards), 1969] Here’s a thought. As a historical thing, Jewish Philosophy and Thought has been the practice in which Jews and a putative Judaism are the subjects of thought and the objects of thinking. An example: Philo, Maimonides, Buber and Plaskow are clearly identifiable Jewish subjects thinking about Judaism and other things from within a Judaism. But what if we remove the subject position from Jewish philosophy and thought? Can this be done? What if we separate the object from the subject? No longer subjects-of thought, Jews and Judaism become objects for-thought. I don’t know precisely how this would work. It is an experiment in which critical distance might let all kinds of people, things, and thinking into the force-field. The otherwise heavy one ton prop that is Jewish philosophy and thought might assume a certain a new form of plausibility.
- Zachary Braiterman is Professor of Religion in the Department of Religion at Syracuse University. His specialization is modern Jewish thought and philosophical aesthetics. Facebook | Twitter | Academia.edu.
jewishphilosophy place @ Facebook
-
Recent Posts
- (The Capitol Building) So Much American Civil Religion & The Problem of Evil
- Video From Mars
- Rush Limbaugh at Yeshiva Bubble
- Teaching the Holocaust (Jewish Difference)
- (Un/Civil Religion) The U.S. Capitol Is An Animal Being
- (Jacob Lawrence) Black Americans & the American Revolution (Struggle)
- (Rich Crimson Purple) The Color of Power in the Bible (אַרְגָּמָן)
- Uncivil Religion (Haredi) (Coronavirus)
- National Jewish Book Award Winners (2020)
- Online Holocaust Memorialization Platforms & Post-Holocaust Culture
- Bernie
- (Arendt) Fascist Insurrection & White Christian Nationalism (Trump)
- (Birthday) JPP is 9 Years Old (2020)
- (Jewish) Prayer (Gentile Kings and Democratic Country)
- Zachary Taylor (Trump Insurrection) (2021)
- “What is the Mishnah?” an International Zoom Workshop Sponsored by Harvard University
- (Rashi) Translation At Sefaria (FYI)
- God in the Poetics of Space (Bachelard)
- (Jewish Law) The Tikvah Fund = The Conservative U.S. Group Trying to Transform Israel’s Justice System
- Shekhina (2nd Temple & Rabbinic Sources)
- The Ultimate “Hasmoneans & Hanukah” 2020 Twitter Thread
- (Jews Love Hanukah) Sensible Excess (Maimonides)
- (Jewish Social Studies) Epidemics & Other Disasters: Views from Jewish Studies (Coronavirus)
- (The IHRA Working Definition of Anti-Semitism) Does Not Suppress Free Speech or Palestine
- (Chabad Redesign) 770
- (Anti-Zionism = Anti-Semitism) + (Zionism = Racism)
- Judean Pillar Figurines (Probably not a Goddess)
- Thanksgiving Covid Looks Like This
- Persian Fallow Deer (Biblical)
- The New New Jewish Left (Samuel Hayim Brody Reads Atalia Omer)
- aesthetics
- affect
- American Judaism
- ancient Near East
- animals
- anti-Semitism
- architecture
- art
- Ashkenaz
- BDS
- Bible
- blog
- body
- Buber and Rosenzweig
- Buddhism
- China
- Christianity
- cinema
- cosmopolitanism
- death
- Deleuze
- ethics
- food
- gender
- God
- Heschel
- Holocaust
- Husserl
- image
- in-the-car
- India
- Islam
- Israel
- Jerusalem
- Jewish art
- Jewish Philosophy
- Jewish Studies
- Judaism
- Kabbalah-Hasidut
- law
- liberalism
- literature
- Maimonides
- Mendelssohn
- messianism
- Mordecai Kaplan
- Museums & Galleries
- music
- nature
- New York
- object
- Palestine
- parks & gardens
- Passover
- photography
- political theology
- politics
- race
- racism
- religion
- religion and science
- Religious Studies
- ritual
- science
- sculpture
- secularism
- Shabbat & holidays
- suffering
- synagogue
- Syracuse
- Syracuse University
- Syria
- talmud-midrash
- technology
- what i'm reading
Archives
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
earlier today i hit a paywall trying to access the article mentioned in this interview* but i would guess it might be along the lines yer suggesting if only indirectly
* http://c-j-l-c.org/portfolio/things-beyond-commodities-an-interview-with-branka-arsic/
Dear Zachary:
In my humble opinion, If you take the Jew out of the Philosophy there is no more Jewish Philosophy. There is no specific object, no a specific set of problems that pertain to Judaism that can be explored in insolation from what I feel is the essence of JP. JP does not exist beyond the need to give an account to others and self (but in Greek, as Levinas would say) and others . While jewish tradition may have examples of self reflection, this apparently do not raise to the level of complexity of a philosophical discourse. Probably because J theology is in principle not missionary and therefore does not need to explain itself to others in the same way as, e.g., Christianity. Also J theology is both plain and marginal (I would add, optional), and whatever philosophy it produced did not become part of the religious canon. There is no equivalent to a St Augustine or a St Thomas whose philosophical theories are part of the catholic church’s creed.
While the sages of the Mishna and the Talmud may have been aware of the existence of Philosophical schools, they did not feel obviously the need to engage with their teachings. Philon is an exception, but he is not a rabbi and is not included in the traditional curriculum. All the best. Michael
(you’re probably right) (but the question still remains: is the jew the subject of jewish philosophy or an object of Jewish philosophy)