A Public Mills about the Modern Art

049048047042041040039038

Instead of static shots,  I took some digital snapshots of people milling about a few of the many familiar modern masterpieces at the Museum of Modern Art. I’d highlight three things: [1] the way in which that public physically frames the art, [2] the way in which the art gets embedded inside a public,  [3] a visual point of view that puts both the art and the public in circulation vis-a-vis each other. The art is no longer challenging, but continues to absorb.

About zjb

Zachary Braiterman is Professor of Religion in the Department of Religion at Syracuse University. His specialization is modern Jewish though and philosophical aesthetics. http://religion.syr.edu
This entry was posted in uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A Public Mills about the Modern Art

  1. “Absorb” or “Absorption” is precisely that word used by Walter Benjamin to describe distraction. One time while at the AIC I sat with Chagall’s stained glass for over 40 minutes and got to see a massive amount of people come in and glance for 10 seconds, sometimes even less. The public gawks at artworks moving from one to the next like switching channels on their televisions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s