Cousin ZC is a rationalist. He doesn’t believe in political name calling. But in politics, one has to brand. Comedians understand this as a basic part of their art.
- Zachary Braiterman is Professor of Religion in the Department of Religion at Syracuse University. His specialization is modern Jewish thought and philosophical aesthetics. Facebook | Twitter | Academia.edu.
jewishphilosophy place @ Facebook
-
Recent Posts
- (Jewish) Prayer (Gentile Kings and Democratic Country)
- Zachary Taylor (Trump Insurrection) (2021)
- “What is the Mishnah?” an International Zoom Workshop Sponsored by Harvard University
- (Rashi) Translation At Sefaria (FYI)
- God in the Poetics of Space (Bachelard)
- (Jewish Law) The Tikvah Fund = The Conservative U.S. Group Trying to Transform Israel’s Justice System
- Shekhina (2nd Temple & Rabbinic Sources)
- The Ultimate “Hasmoneans & Hanukah” 2020 Twitter Thread
- (Jews Love Hanukah) Sensible Excess (Maimonides)
- (Jewish Social Studies) Epidemics & Other Disasters: Views from Jewish Studies (Coronavirus)
- (The IHRA Working Definition of Anti-Semitism) Does Not Suppress Free Speech or Palestine
- (Chabad Redesign) 770
- (Anti-Zionism = Anti-Semitism) + (Zionism = Racism)
- Judean Pillar Figurines (Probably not a Goddess)
- Thanksgiving Covid Looks Like This
- Persian Fallow Deer (Biblical)
- The New New Jewish Left (Samuel Hayim Brody Reads Atalia Omer)
- (Theo-Political Aesthetics) Buber (Event Object Vision)
- (Teaching) Anti-Semitism (I Don’t Want To)
- New Jersey Turnpike (Wet)
- Schubert (In the Car)
- Naive & Sentimental (November 3, 2020)
- (CFP) Jewish Thought in Times of Crisis (Special Issue of Religions)
- Biden (2020)
- I Do Not Understand American Christendom (2020 Elections)
- Trump is an “Anti-Semite” (Says Jean-Paul Sartre)
- (Force of Separation) Trump & Orthodox Judaism (Religion, Death, Chaos)
- Haredim & State
- (סמא דמותא) Death-Torah (Coronavirus)
- (HAZMAT) Haredi Jewish Studies (Coronavirus)
- aesthetics
- affect
- American Judaism
- ancient Near East
- animals
- anti-Semitism
- architecture
- art
- Ashkenaz
- BDS
- Bible
- blog
- body
- Buber and Rosenzweig
- Buddhism
- China
- Christianity
- cinema
- cosmopolitanism
- death
- Deleuze
- ethics
- food
- gender
- God
- Heschel
- Holocaust
- Husserl
- image
- in-the-car
- India
- Islam
- Israel
- Jerusalem
- Jewish art
- Jewish Philosophy
- Jewish Studies
- Judaism
- Kabbalah-Hasidut
- law
- liberalism
- literature
- Maimonides
- Mendelssohn
- messianism
- Mordecai Kaplan
- Museums & Galleries
- music
- nature
- New York
- object
- Palestine
- parks & gardens
- Passover
- photography
- politics
- race
- racism
- reason
- religion
- religion and science
- Religious Studies
- ritual
- science
- sculpture
- secularism
- Shabbat & holidays
- suffering
- synagogue
- Syracuse
- Syracuse University
- Syria
- talmud-midrash
- technology
- what i'm reading
Archives
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
Zach, You know it’s specifically the Nazi name-calling I reject: the fact that it both offends history and truth when it trivializes the Nazi crimes, and that it inoculates your political opponents to criticism they might actually need to face (by hurling the worst possible allegation when it’s demonstrably unsubstantiated to anyone that doesn’t already share your precise political perspective). Your commentaries are generally not satire (as far as I can tell) and not meant to be read as comedy. I have no problem with naming, calliing out and shaming Neo-Nazis who identify themselves as such (with calls of Zig Hail and with Nazi salutes, for instance), or naming others Eliminationist Antisemites (in the West, those typically to be found on the left in recent times). I do not lump others with them, based on who they vote for (in a country where there are only two viable candidates), only then to label these others collaborators or enablers – I don’t see my vote for Hillary as collaboration with or enabling the eliminationist antisemites who also voted for her. I don’t see how the two are different, except that you say “but THEY really ARE Nazis”. And I don’t see how pointing out such fellow-traveling works as a tool of political persuasion. In short: the more outrageous and far-fetched your rhetoric, the less you’ll be taken seriously (unless you’re Trump, apparently, but is he your role-model) and be effective, and when the shock-rhetoric is Nazi/Holocaust related, you’re also demeaning our history/memories that may still have a real role to play.
But you miss the point. Usually I would agree with you about the Nazi usage. In this case, however, now we’re looking at actual Nazis on the alt-right. This is no longer about the Holocaust. This is something new. About fellow-travelling, one is responsible. You could vote for Clinton in good conscience because she has a proven record as a friend of the Jews and there being no evidence that she has supported that eliminationist anti-Zionist wing of the radical left, or that she empowered them as a way to gin up her base. If there was any evidence of such you would not have voted for her, and would have been right to do so. At any rate, this is an intra-Jewish polemic. I don’t expect to be taken seriously by Sheldon Adelsons, and I don’t think I can persuade people with strong convictions. But I do think calling out this connection and the language of “making common cause with Nazis” is pretty effective in establishing red lines and putting people on notice. In actual practice, I’d play this Nazi-collaboration card lightly. You can even use softer language if you want to make the same connections between Trump and the way he drummed up the racist KKK and Nazi right in this country. But I think it’s important to have it on hand. Yes, this is Holocaust related, no doubt. But I’m only pointing out some uncomfortable truths about current political constellations. This is radically new here in the U.S. with David Duke and others of his ilk now more visible and in public view than at anytime since the 1960s. I’ve never used this language before, and you know that. The language suddenly fits, which I’m actually sorty to say
I agree that this alt right phenomenon should never be normalized. This is not a case of crying wolf. Stuff got real this November 9