(A Sketch) Religion & Society (First Things)

Pompeii_family_feast_painting_Naples

(Pompeii Family)

Against this nonsense that religion comes first, maybe it comes second.

Ornament, not foundation

Understanding that religion and society are almost always already there together, distinct, but not separable

The following is by way of a heuristic experiment + reading outline open to revision

[I]

In this world:

Religion is not a social “foundation.”

It does not come first.

[II]

Group life and bare life of society come first.

–Aristotle (politics and life)

–Foucault (the disciplinary state: hospitals, public health)

–Marx (economy, labor, capital)

[III]

Religion is a social “buttress.”

–Durkheim (religious moral community)

–De Beauvoir (a patriarchal structure)

[III]

Religion is attributive/ascriptive:

–Weber (meaning and value)

–Taves

[IV]

Religious experience is a psychic ornament:

–Tylor (animism of spiritual beings in the world)

–Max Müller (the infinite)

–James (varieties of religious experience)

–Freud (illusion)

–Caroline Walker Bynum (more varieties of religious experience)

 

FOR AN ALTERNATIVE SKETCH

This one is provided by colleague and friend Gail Hamner:

[I]

 

In this world:

 

Why the obsession with origins? (cf. Marx, Nietzsche, Foucault)

Religion is a social foundation because religion is an affective technology of valuation.

Which came first: society or valuation? What does it matter? They are just two ways of saying the same thing.

[II]

Bare life always refers implicitly or explicitly to a group:

–Genesis 1-2

–Plato’s Timaeus

–Augustine’s City of God

–Christine de Pisan, The Book of the City of Ladies

–Spinoza, Theologico-political treatise

Cf. G. Agamben’s Homo Sacer and K. Karatani’s Isonomia

[III]

Sometimes religion as valuation is ascribed:

–Hegel’s Philosophy of Right      

Cf. TL Brown, Religion, Modernity and Politics in Hegel and Jameson, The Hegel Variations: On the Phenomenology of Spirit

–Marx, “On the Jewish Question,” The German Ideology

Cf. The section on “Marx” in the opening of Spivak’s Critique of Postcolonial Reason

–Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of an American Slave

–Elizabeth Cady Stanton, The Women’s Bible

–Walter Rauschenbusch, Christianizing the Social Order

–Kathryn Lofton, Consuming Religion

[IV]

Is “religious experience” a tool for analysis or an object of analysis?

–Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morals

–William James, VRE

–Durkheim, ERE

–Foucault on “political spirituality” (see op-ed.s on Iranian Revolution)

–Ashon Crawley, Black Pentecostal Breath

–Melissa Wilcox, Queer Religiosities: An Introduction; or, selections from Queer Nuns: Religion, Activism, and Serious Parody

 

 

 

About zjb

Zachary Braiterman is Professor of Religion in the Department of Religion at Syracuse University. His specialization is modern Jewish thought and philosophical aesthetics. http://religion.syr.edu
This entry was posted in uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s